clock menu more-arrow no yes

Filed under:

Stoke City vs. Chelsea, Premier League: Opposition Analysis

New, comments

Joe Allen: pretty good! Everyone else: pretty bad!

Stoke City v Crystal Palace - Premier League Photo by Mark Robinson/Getty Images

The Season So Far

Much like Stoke City’s 2015-16 season, so far 2016-17 has been something of a triumph against the odds. Manager Mark Hughes has almost never had a full-strength eleven to put on the pitch, and even though they’ve never managed to put together a coherent system or stem the tide of shots on their goal, they’re in 9th place as always, miles clear of the relegation battle and, somehow, enjoying themselves all the while.

The season started horricially. Getting thumped by Manchester City, Liverpool and Spurs is nothing to be embarrassed about – most Premier League teams will suffer that fate this season – but getting absolutely destroyed by the likes of Crystal Palace and losing to Bournemouth doesn’t speak well of anyone. Most of all, this does not reflect well on the manager.

Signings like Wilfried Bony, Bruno Martins Indi and Giannelli Imbula were supposed to raise the bar in the Potteries, but while Martins Indi has impressed at times, Bony and Imbula have flopped horrendously, sucked into the same mediocre stupor as the rest of the squad. Bony was this week quoted as having said “I do wonder sometimes why I came here.” This does not reflect well on the manager.

On the plus side, Joe Allen has impressed in a surprisingly un-Welsh-Xavi box-to-box/second-striker role, but besides Allen, Martins Indi and left-back Erik Pieters, no Stoke player has had a good season. Well, maybe Mame Biram Diouf, but, well… he’s Mame Biram Diouf.

Admittedly, Stoke’s rotten luck with injuries has consistently hampered their chances of improving as a unit. Xherdan Shaqiri, Bojan and Geoff Cameron have all been unavailable for varying spells, while injuries to first choice strikers and goalkeeper have meant that Peter Crouch (35) and Shay Given (40) have seen rather more action than expected, while Jonathan Walters (33) keeps getting minutes under his belt.

And yet… they’re still 9th.

The Season Ahead

There remains the hope that one day Stoke will click and produce the spectacular football they’re so obviously capable of, but under Hughes it’s hard to shake the feeling that they’ll forever remain maddeningly flawed and easy to beat. They have the occasional good game against a top side, which leads to the impression that things are clicking, but a month down the line they’re still an inconsistent, ramshackle set of chancers. This does not reflect well on the manager.

The worst thing is that even when Stoke win, they don’t look like a proper team. Looking at the numbers, it doesn’t look like they have any kind of plan, or a style of play, or an identity, nor that they’re moving towards one at any notable rate. Frankly, what Hughes does on the training ground all week is anyone’s guess.

Tactics

For most of the season, Hughes has switched between 4-2-3-1 and 4-3-3 formations depending on the opposition and his team’s aims in the game. Regardless of whichever system they use they’re pretty unbalanced and very poor at keeping the ball, so the basic idea seems to be to pack the centre and make it hard for the other team to progress up the pitch. At their worst – in the 4-1 shellacking away to Liverpool, for example – they’ve been beyond dire. At their best, they’ve been just about okay. This does not reflect well on the manager.

On the plus side, their deep (read: out of control) base position gave a lot of space to play on the counter, and Joe Allen has expertly exploited space and driven Stoke up the pitch all season. Shaqiri and Marko Arnautović, unsurprisingly, have caught the eye when things have gotten frantic enough to allow them to play one-against-one with opposition full-backs, but neither has produced the goods anywhere near as often as their talent suggests they should have. This does not reflect well on the manager.

Strengths

Most of Stoke’s strengths are pretty insignificant in the grand scheme of things. They remain positively mighty in the air: 21.3 aerial duels won per game is the third highest average in the league, and although The Devil Tony Pulis is long gone, the Potters retain the look of a team built by the evil Welshman: eleven of their first-team squad stand 6’1” or taller. Several of those players have yet to learn that the ball can be kicked as well as headed.

Unsurprisingly, given their lack of ability to control games or play as a collective, Stoke have to work very hard off the ball. However, little of this hard work comes in midfield and even less in attack, meaning that the back five does basically everything to stop Stoke conceding goals. One gets the feeling players like Diego Costa, Willian and Pedro would end up vomiting in equal parts rage and disgust watching the way Stoke’s forwards “defend”. This does not reflect well on the manager.

On a more positive (and bizarre) note, only Bournemouth have been fouled more times than Stoke so far this season. If these fouls were won in the box, or if Stoke had a coherent plan to exploit set pieces via the cultured left feet of Shaqiri and Charlie Adam, for example, they could make something of this. Alas, they don’t.

So, in summary: no significant strengths bar the occasional flash of individual talent from Shaqiri or Arnautović, plus the guile of Allen.

Weaknesses

Stoke’s shot figures are basically atrocious. 11.1 total shots per game taken is one of the league’s middling figures, just below the league average, while 3.8 shots on target per game puts them below Bournemouth, Crystal Palace, and Swansea and level with Watford (for context, Watford are absolutely awful). While personnel issues may go some way to explaining this, the fact is Stoke can’t make chances or finish them. This does not reflect well on the manager.

To make matters considerably worse, they’ve allowed an average of 14.5 shots per game and 4.6 of those have ended up on target. One reason that Stoke give away so many chances is that they can’t keep the ball or win it back: 75.4% pass completion is one of the league’s lower averages, while they don’t make anywhere near enough tackles or interceptions off the ball to balance out their basic badness on it.

On top of this, they’re prone to making atrocious individual errors and gifting the opposition chances. No team blocks fewer passes and only three teams block more shots. It’s very difficult to have such a pitiful attacking threat, such an inability to control the game and so little stopping the opposition getting to your goal, and do anything other than lose.

TL;DR: Mark Hughes is an idiot.

Likely XIs

As ever, Stoke’s line-up will be heavily depleted by injuries and will bear little resemblance to what is theoretically their strongest eleven. Certain starters Jack Butland, Glen Johnson, Bojan and Xherdan Shaqiri are all out, and Marko Arnautović is also a doubt. Geoff Cameron has returned, however, and has helped Stoke to keep consecutive clean sheets in a busy defensive midfield role.

As for Chelsea, you don’t need to be told.

Prediction

Stoke are rubbish. Chelsea are closing in on another title. Antonio Conte surely won’t let them screw this up. A very professional 2-1 win in store for the Blues.