clock menu more-arrow no yes mobile

Filed under:

Some interesting tidbits on Michael Essien and Daniel Sturridge

Getty Images

Let me start this with a big caveat. John Cross is a journalist for the Daily Mirror. The Daily Mirror is an absolutely horrible publication. They have an absolutely horrible reputation for accuracy or having any sort of standards, and their stories are usually best ignored. That said, it's deadline day and there are all sorts of reports out there involving both Michael Essien and Daniel Sturridge. Cross has interesting notes on both situations, so why don't we take a look. First, we'll look at Sturridge:

Again, this makes very little sense. Why Chelsea would agree to loan out their only backup striker who happens to be in the last year of his deal is a relevant question to ask, and this report being true would only make it more confusing. Now we have Essien:

Again, this would make very little sense. Chelsea wouldn't seem to have any real need to loan out Essien, but if they were considering a loan they'd almost certainly prefer not to send him to a Premier League rival.

These are fun to read I suppose, but the fact that it's a Mirro employee tweeting these comments makes me extremely skeptical. We'll probably never know the specifics of either of these deals, but the good news is that both seem to be moving in the "not happening" direction. Just under three hours to go...

Follow us on Twitter

Sign up for the newsletter Sign up for the We Ain't Got No History Daily Roundup newsletter!

A daily roundup of Chelsea news from We Ain't Got No History