clock menu more-arrow no yes

Filed under:

Homegrown Players In The 2011/12 Season - Analysing The Chelsea Roster

New, comments
PORTSMOUTH, ENGLAND - JULY 16:  Ryan Bertrand of Chelsea during the Pre Season Friendly match between Portsmouth and Chelsea at Fratton Park on July 16, 2011 in Portsmouth, England.  (Photo by Tom Shaw/Getty Images)
PORTSMOUTH, ENGLAND - JULY 16: Ryan Bertrand of Chelsea during the Pre Season Friendly match between Portsmouth and Chelsea at Fratton Park on July 16, 2011 in Portsmouth, England. (Photo by Tom Shaw/Getty Images)
Getty Images

With the relatively confusing homegrown player rules having a real influence on roster building, it's probably time to take a look at how the current team stacks up against said rules. By the time August 31st rolls around, Chelsea will need to pare down their senior player squad to 25, and then make further cuts to the non-homegrown roster - they're permitted only 17 non-homegrown players in that 25.

So, some definitions first. A player is a senior player for the 2011/12 season if they were born before January 1st, 1990. As a result, there've been a few graduations into the senior squad: Assuming that all stay with the team, Daniel Sturridge, Slobodan Rajkovic and Ryan Bertrand each now count against the 25-man limit.

Now for homegrown-ness, which is a little more tricky. According to the Premier League, a homegrown player is defined as follows:

A home-grown player will be defined as one who, irrespective of his nationality or age, has been registered with any club affiliated to the Football Association or the Football Association of Wales for a period, continuous or not, of three entire seasons or 36 months prior to his 21st birthday (or the end of the Season during which he turns 21).‬‪


So Nicolas Anelka, for example, is not home grown, despite being signed by Arsenal as a 17-year-old - he only played for two and a half years with them being wandering off to Real Madrid (thanks, Wenger, that was very helpful). If he had joined the Gunners in the summer 1996 transfer window rather than the winter 1997 one, he'd count as home grown, despite having moved to Madrid before turning 21. Slobodan Rajkovic, on the other hand, is a foreign player who's been playing on the continent for several seasons, but because he's been registered at Chelsea since 2005, he counts as home grown.

Got all of that? No? No worries, because we have a handy-dandy graph for you to take a look at. It features all of the Chelsea players with squad numbers on date of publishing, as best as I can tell:

Figure 1: Current Chelsea roster for 2011/12 season. Homegrown players are marked in green, junior players in blue.

That's fourteen juniors, seven players who qualify as home-grown, and seventeen who are foreign and over 21. All of the junior players, incidentally, will count as homegrown by the time they turn 21, so nothing to worry about there. Anyway, the limit to Chelsea's over-21 squad is eight homegrown and seventeen foreign players, so it looks like on paper that the Blues can either bring in someone who qualifies as homegrown or sell in order to make a purchase.

But that's not actually true. These rules only apply outside of the transfer window - in August and January you can field whatever squad you like without having to make drastic cuts to fulfill the homegrown requirements. This means that there are essentially two periods of compliance Andre Villas-Boas and company need to deal with here: September through December and February through May.

That, of course, has real relevance, because Michael Essien isn't expected to return until at least January, which frees up a spot in that seventeen for the Blues to play with before he returns. This provides the club with an interesting gamble, which I'm not sure they'll take. Do they fill that now and sell off a player in January? Do they keep their squad at sixteen plus seven in order to avoid making a bad deal on a player in the winter window? Or do they just start selling now?

The pessimist in me says that it'll be option two, which is the least exciting, but there's a very real chance the Blues will be able to use Essien's injury to incorporate his replacement into the squad without really running afoul of the homegrown rules. That, at least, is something to keep a very close eye on as we barrel towards the beginning of the season.

Using Essien's injury to add another player to the roster is of course only ever going to be a temporary solution, delaying the problem until winter at the very latest. The simple fact of the matter is that at some point, CHelsea will be forced into getting rid of some of their non-English talent. That's not such a bad thing, considering the wages that they command, but they'll have to be very careful about who they get rid of and who they keep. Let's take a look at some possible candidates from the non-starter pool.

  • Henrique Hilario. In my mind, Hilario's the first to go if Chelsea need to free up a slot. In fact, Chelsea might not even need to bother adding him to the roster for the Premier League - he could just play in the cups and be an emergency player should Petr Cech go down. It's not like he's any better than Ross Turnbull, anyway.
  • Jose Bosingwa. Bosingwa has one year left on his contract and is by no means in line for the starting right back slot, which should probably be Branislav Ivanovic's . He's suffered huge injury problems in the past couple of seasons that've really put a damper on his effecitveness, and it wouldn't be a shock to see him move on - but only if he was replaced by an incoming right back.
  • Paulo Ferreira. I love Ferreira, and he's the only all-around utility fullback we have. That said, he's not very good, he's old, relatively expensive and takes up one of those homegrown player slots. Nope.
  • Alex. Due to the circumstances surrounding having a really fragile centre half and your third choice centre back also your starting right back, the fourth centre back position is rather more important to Chelsea than to virtually every other team in the league. Alex is a reliable bench player with all the quality to start in the Premier League, so I'm not seeing the rationale to move him just to open up a foreign player slot.
  • Yossi Benayoun. Due to Frank Lampard being on what seem worrisomely close to his last legs, it would seem a little bit absurd for Chelsea to ditch the one man who could reliably replace him as a central attacking midfielder. There's no reason to send Benayoun packing unless the Blues bring in a player like Javier Pastore, and even then there are better targets for the axe.
  • Yuri Zhirkov. This is an interesting one. Zhirkov is extremely useful, in theory, for being able to competently play everywhere on the left. He's left useful because he's always broken, so he never plays and is quite cranky about that. I like him a lot, but would we even notice if he was gone? (Yes, because I would have to write a post about it.)
  • Salomon Kalou. With Nicolas Anelka declaring that he'll see out the final year of his contract at Stamford Bridge, Salomon Kalou becomes a possible candidate to lose his job with the team. He's a decent enough reserve Premier League striker who'd be a first choice-player in most team in the division despite his wayward shooting - he gets to above average in a weird and roundabout way, but manages it nonetheless. Possibly a January move, though; with Danny Sturridge still untested as a Chelsea player he'll be useful to keep around for a while. Plus, adorable.

So, there you have it. The home grown situation isn't quite as restrictive as it could be, and there are definitely a full tricks Chelsea could pull to acquire some foreign players without having to sell (although there's a big enough list to sell, if it came to that). The Blues look like they're in pretty good shape to make some major additions without causing any headaches until winter, so we can probably relax a little bit about how much the rules will affect the club. Hurray!