2011/12 Chelsea Statistics - Plus/Minus: Formations, Managers

AVB: 4-3-3 is better! RDM: No, 4-2-3-1 is better! AVB: SHAMPOO IS BETTER!

At the beginning of the summer, I had grand plans of posting statistical summaries of Chelsea's historic 2011/12 season. Then as life, death, work, and fun continually (and in varying order) intervened, things fell by the wayside. Suddenly we find ourselves just a few days before the first match of the 2012/13 season! Hopefully that's enough time to talk about a few pluses and minuses at least.

Previously...[Minutes], [Goals], [Assists, Addendum]

The prevailing theme had been to apply some hockey-style mechanics to the football stats and that's where we will continue with the good ol' Plus/Minus. The only difference in its application is that there are no power plays to account for and penalty shots do count.

Since there are only five non-goalie players on the ice at most times, the Plus/Minus may carry a bit more meaning in hockey* (i.e. at most, only 5 outfield players would factor into a goal), but it's not entirely meaningless in football either - especially when we cast it in the context of formations (this post - i.e. "goal difference"), individual players (next post), and player partnerships (next next post).

* even more so when you combine it with stuff like Corsi Numbers (Shots +/-) and the like...

Complicating matters and data tables slightly is the managerial change, although the two of them divide quite clearly along the 4-3-3/4-2-3-1 battle lines. Both men stuck almost exclusively to their formation of choice, with just a tiny-tiny sprinkling of the occasional 4-4-2 thrown in. I did not try to assign a formation for when Chelsea played with one or two men down.

In a few instances, I also simplified matters by lumping a few wacky line combinations into more recognized structures. The unorthodox 4-1-3-2 of the early season matchup with Norwich City springs to mind (shifted to a 4-3-3), or that one time when for 7 minutes we had the following out there: Cech - Cahill, Luiz, Cole - Meireles, Lampard - Malouda, Mata, Ramires - Drogba, Torres. I don't even know what to call that (3-2-3-2?), so I lumped it into a 4-4-2 with Ramires as the nominal right back.

Let's look at the Premier League first: 38 games, 3420 minutes. If you're a fan of AVB, cherish this, because this is the only one where his 4-3-3 shows the better results. If you're still bitter over how Di Matteo de-prioritized the league and exposed our lack of any true squad depth, look away (thank the maker for that 6:1 beatdown of QPR!).


Champions League: 13 games, 1230 minutes. The contrast between the struggles of AVB's 4-2-3-1 (Leverkusen, Napoli) and the defensive magnificence of Di Matteo's version is quite clear. Robbie cheated just once on his 4-2-3-1: during the last 26 minutes of the First Miracle of Stamford Bridge, v. Napoli.


FA/League Cup: 10 games, 960 minutes. The right-hand side of this chart looks quite handy. On the other hand, AVB sure had his hands full with red cards: Chelsea were down a man (that's TWO hands) almost a quarter of the hand time!


Overall: 61 games, 5610 minutes. Without dwelling too much on opposition quality and the like, Chelsea were slightly more efficient in a 4-3-3: +25 over 2963 minutes (a +1 every 118 minutes), as opposed to the 4-2-3-1 (a +1 every 126 minutes). Comparing just each manager's "strength" however, Di Matteo comes out well on top (101 minutes for each RDM-4231 +1 v. 121 minutes for each AVB-433).

In fact, he's almost as good as when Chelsea play a man or two short (also 101 minutes for each +1). We clearly need to get more red cards (or play Swansea City and/or Barcelona at all times; certainly NOT Manchester City)!


Log In Sign Up

Log In Sign Up

Forgot password?

We'll email you a reset link.

If you signed up using a 3rd party account like Facebook or Twitter, please login with it instead.

Forgot password?

Try another email?

Almost done,

By becoming a registered user, you are also agreeing to our Terms and confirming that you have read our Privacy Policy.

Join We Ain't Got No History

You must be a member of We Ain't Got No History to participate.

We have our own Community Guidelines at We Ain't Got No History. You should read them.

Join We Ain't Got No History

You must be a member of We Ain't Got No History to participate.

We have our own Community Guidelines at We Ain't Got No History. You should read them.




Choose an available username to complete sign up.

In order to provide our users with a better overall experience, we ask for more information from Facebook when using it to login so that we can learn more about our audience and provide you with the best possible experience. We do not store specific user data and the sharing of it is not required to login with Facebook.